 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434 vs Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Xeon Gold 6434 vs Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, programming, rendering, streaming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, AIDA64, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, WPrime, Handbrake, RealBench, Gears 5, MATLAB, Blender, Blender, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ or Intel Xeon Gold 6434.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Gold 6434 | 62% |
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Gold 6434 is 9% better than Xeon Gold 5415+. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Gold 6434 | 64% |
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 112.8 | 99.8 | | Valorant | 128.2 | 113.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.8 | 63.5 | | Apex Legends | 120.5 | 106.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.1 | 85.0 | | Overwatch | 103.8 | 91.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.5 | 78.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.1 | 56.7 | | Warzone | 100.0 | 88.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 107.7 | 95.3 | | Valheim | 106.4 | 94.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Gold 6434 | 27% |
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 21% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 6434 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 5415+ as it consumes less power: 195W vs. 150W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 885 | 447 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2858 | 1426 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1964 | 983 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7051 | 3506 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1368 | 687 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40142 | 19920 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Single-Core | 12464 | 6191 | | Multi-Core | 40862 | 20277 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Single-Core | 1607 | 986 | | Multi-Core | 24327 | 11560 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Announcement date | March 12, 2023 | March 15, 2023 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | FCLGA4677 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Sapphire Rapids | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 32000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 195 W | 150 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 22.5 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6434 is 21% better than Xeon Gold 5415+ in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6434 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ is better: 3
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon Gold 6434 and Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Gold 6434 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
