 |
AMD EPYC 7773X vs Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|
Processor comparisons 20-04-2023
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7773X vs Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Blender, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Furmark, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, Gears 5, PassMark, VeraCrypt, 7zip, 3DMark, Prime95, Blender, RealBench, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ or AMD EPYC 7773X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7773X | 74% |
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7773X is 24% better than Xeon Gold 5415+. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7773X | 80% |
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 142.2 | 99.8 | | Valorant | 161.6 | 113.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.5 | 63.5 | | Apex Legends | 151.9 | 106.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 121.2 | 85.0 | | Overwatch | 130.9 | 91.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.5 | 78.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 80.8 | 56.7 | | Warzone | 126.0 | 88.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 135.7 | 95.3 | | Valheim | 134.1 | 94.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7773X | 16% |
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 21% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 5415+ is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7773X since it has less power consumption: 280W vs. 150W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 447 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9889 | 1426 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 481 | 983 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 24485 | 3506 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1115 | 687 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 54474 | 19920 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Single-Core | 2797 | 6191 | | Multi-Core | 79901 | 20277 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Single-Core | 1385 | 986 | | Multi-Core | 53124 | 11560 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7773X |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | March 15, 2023 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA4677 | | Core name | Milan | Sapphire Rapids | | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | | Generation | 3 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 8 | | Threads | 128 | 16 | | Bus rate | | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 32000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 150 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 22.5 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000504
100-000000504​WOF | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 5415+ is 24% better than EPYC 7773X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7773X has 56 more core than Xeon Gold 5415+. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7773X is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ is better: 11
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7773X and Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7773X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
