|
Intel Core i5-13500HX vs Apple M2 Max |
|
Processor comparisons 28-01-2023 Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13500HX vs Apple M2 Max and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, video editing, machine learning, streaming. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Furmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, SuperPi, Gears 5, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, Prime95, AIDA64, RealBench, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Valheim
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Apple M2 Max or Intel Core i5-13500HX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13500HX | 58% |
M2 Max | 62% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M2 Max is 6% better than Core i5-13500HX. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13500HX | 57% |
M2 Max | 60% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.1 | 106.0 | Valorant | 114.9 | 120.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.3 | 67.4 | Apex Legends | 108.0 | 113.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.2 | 90.3 | Overwatch | 93.0 | 97.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.3 | 83.1 | DOOM Eternal | 57.4 | 60.2 | Warzone | 89.6 | 93.9 | Assassin's Creed | 96.5 | 101.2 | Valheim | 95.3 | 99.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13500HX | 173% |
M2 Max | 465% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M2 Max is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13500HX since it has less power consumption: 38W vs. 15W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13500HX |
Apple M2 Max | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 279 | 389 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2710 | 2220 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 451 | 761 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5999 | 3801 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1535 | 2204 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17212 | 17142 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500HX |
Apple M2 Max | Single-Core | 1406 | 6536 | Multi-Core | 29320 | 42246 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500HX |
Apple M2 Max | Single-Core | 1975 | 2096 | Multi-Core | 12829 | 17617 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13500HX |
Apple M2 Max | Announcement date | December 12, 2022 | October 20, 2022 | Type | Laptop | Desktop;Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | M2 | Core name | Raptor Lake | 8x Avalanche and 4x Blizzard | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 3.49 MHz | Cores | 14 | 12 | Threads | 20 | 12 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 68000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 38 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 412 GByte/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 4MB | L2 cache | 6 MB | 24MB | L3 cache | 44 MB | 48MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M2 Max is 31% better than Core i5-13500HX in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13500HX has 2 more core than M2 Max. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500HX is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 Max is better: 24 However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13500HX and Apple M2 Max before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13500HX Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
Apple M2 Max Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
| |
|