|
Apple M2 Max vs Intel Core i5-12500H |
|
Processor comparisons 22-10-2022 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Apple M2 Max vs Intel Core i5-12500H tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, programming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Furmark, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Prime95, 3DMark, PCMark 10, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, Blender, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-12500H or Apple M2 Max.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
M2 Max | 62% |
Core i5-12500H | 57% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M2 Max is 8% better than Core i5-12500H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.M2 Max | 60% |
Core i5-12500H | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, Control, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 106.0 | 98.6 | Valorant | 120.4 | 112.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 67.4 | 62.7 | Apex Legends | 113.2 | 105.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 90.3 | 84.0 | Overwatch | 97.5 | 90.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 83.1 | 77.3 | DOOM Eternal | 60.2 | 56.0 | Warzone | 93.9 | 87.4 | Assassin's Creed | 101.2 | 94.1 | Valheim | 99.9 | 93.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M2 Max | 465% |
Core i5-12500H | 143% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M2 Max is more energy efficient than the Core i5-12500H as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 40W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M2 Max |
Intel Core i5-12500H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 389 | 312 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2220 | 2282 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 761 | 748 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3801 | 5183 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2204 | 1749 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17142 | 17085 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M2 Max |
Intel Core i5-12500H | Single-Core | 6536 | 4099 | Multi-Core | 42246 | 23919 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M2 Max |
Intel Core i5-12500H | Single-Core | 2096 | 1721 | Multi-Core | 17617 | 10346 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Apple M2 Max |
Intel Core i5-12500H | Announcement date | October 20, 2022 | January 07, 2022 | Type | Desktop;Laptop | Laptop | Socket | M2 | FCBGA1744 | Core name | 8x Avalanche and 4x Blizzard | Alder Lake | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | x86 | Generation | 2 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 3.49 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Cores | 12 | 12 | Threads | 12 | 16 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 68000 millions | 10200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 40 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 412 GByte/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 4MB | | L2 cache | 24MB | | L3 cache | 48MB | 18 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M2 Max is 5% better than Core i5-12500H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 Max is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-12500H is better: 7 Although it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Apple M2 Max and Intel Core i5-12500H before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Apple M2 Max Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
Intel Core i5-12500H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Celeron N5105 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|