 |
Apple M2 Max vs Intel Core i5-13400 |
|
Processor comparisons 22-10-2022 If you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Apple M2 Max vs Intel Core i5-13400 and understand which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, SuperPi, Gears 5, 3DMark, WPrime, Handbrake, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, PCMark 10, Blender, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, PassMark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-13400 or Apple M2 Max.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
M2 Max | 62% |
Core i5-13400 | 59% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M2 Max is 4% better than Core i5-13400. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.M2 Max | 60% |
Core i5-13400 | 56% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 106.0 | 100.3 | Valorant | 120.4 | 114.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 67.4 | 63.8 | Apex Legends | 113.2 | 107.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 90.3 | 85.5 | Overwatch | 97.5 | 92.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 83.1 | 78.6 | DOOM Eternal | 60.2 | 57.0 | Warzone | 93.9 | 88.9 | Assassin's Creed | 101.2 | 95.7 | Valheim | 99.9 | 94.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M2 Max | 465% |
Core i5-13400 | 91% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M2 Max is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13400 as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M2 Max |
Intel Core i5-13400 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 389 | 276 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2220 | 2844 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 761 | 457 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3801 | 6319 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2204 | 1603 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17142 | 18171 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M2 Max |
Intel Core i5-13400 | Single-Core | 6536 | 1465 | Multi-Core | 42246 | 30969 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M2 Max |
Intel Core i5-13400 | Single-Core | 2096 | 1786 | Multi-Core | 17617 | 12045 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Apple M2 Max |
Intel Core i5-13400 | Announcement date | October 20, 2022 | September 23, 2022 | Type | Desktop;Laptop | Desktop | Socket | M2 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | 8x Avalanche and 4x Blizzard | Raptor Lake | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | x86 | Generation | 2 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | | 4.6 MHz | Frequency | 3.49 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 12 | 10 | Threads | 12 | 16 | Bus rate | | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 68000 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 65 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 4800 | Memory bandwidth | 412 GByte/s | 68 GB/s | L1 cache | 4MB | 1 MB | L2 cache | 24MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 48MB | 16 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M2 Max is 28% better than Core i5-13400 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M2 Max has 2 more core than Core i5-13400. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 Max is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400 is better: 9 However, it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Apple M2 Max and Intel Core i5-13400 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Apple M2 Max Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
Intel Core i5-13400 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|