|
Intel Core i5-13400F vs Apple M2 Max |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 For example you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13400F vs Apple M2 Max and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, rendering, machine learning, video editing. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, PCMark 10, Furmark, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, VeraCrypt, PassMark, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, MATLAB, AIDA64, Blender. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Apple M2 Max or Intel Core i5-13400F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13400F | 59% |
M2 Max | 62% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M2 Max is 4% better than Core i5-13400F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13400F | 57% |
M2 Max | 60% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 100.6 | 106.0 | Valorant | 114.3 | 120.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.0 | 67.4 | Apex Legends | 107.4 | 113.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.7 | 90.3 | Overwatch | 92.6 | 97.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.9 | 83.1 | DOOM Eternal | 57.2 | 60.2 | Warzone | 89.2 | 93.9 | Assassin's Creed | 96.0 | 101.2 | Valheim | 94.9 | 99.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13400F | 94% |
M2 Max | 465% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M2 Max is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13400F as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400F |
Apple M2 Max | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 282 | 389 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2875 | 2220 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 465 | 761 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6385 | 3801 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1622 | 2204 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18356 | 17142 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400F |
Apple M2 Max | Single-Core | 1483 | 6536 | Multi-Core | 31282 | 42246 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400F |
Apple M2 Max | Single-Core | 1837 | 2096 | Multi-Core | 12341 | 17617 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13400F |
Apple M2 Max | Announcement date | January 17, 2023 | October 20, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop;Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | M2 | Core name | Raptor Lake | 8x Avalanche and 4x Blizzard | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.49 MHz | Cores | 10 | 12 | Threads | 16 | 12 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 68000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 15 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 412 GByte/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | 4MB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 24MB | L3 cache | 20 MB | 48MB | Overclocking | Yes | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M2 Max is 5% better than Core i5-13400F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M2 Max has 2 more core than Core i5-13400F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400F is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 Max is better: 27 Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13400F and Apple M2 Max before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13400F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Apple M2 Max Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
| |
|