|
Intel Core i3-1215UL vs Intel Core i9-10900TE |
|
Processor comparisons 11-09-2022 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests Intel Core i3-1215UL vs Intel Core i9-10900TE and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Handbrake, PCMark 10, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, SuperPi, WPrime, Prime95, MATLAB, PassMark, Blender, Gears 5, RealBench, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, VeraCrypt. Gaming performance of processors in: - Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10900TE or Intel Core i3-1215UL.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-1215UL | 54% |
Core i9-10900TE | 55% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-10900TE is 1% better than Core i3-1215UL. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-1215UL | 53% |
Core i9-10900TE | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Control, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 94.4 | 95.8 | Valorant | 107.3 | 108.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.1 | 60.9 | Apex Legends | 100.9 | 102.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.5 | 81.6 | Overwatch | 86.9 | 88.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.1 | 75.1 | DOOM Eternal | 53.7 | 54.4 | Warzone | 83.7 | 84.9 | Assassin's Creed | 90.2 | 91.4 | Valheim | 89.1 | 90.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-1215UL | 251% |
Core i9-10900TE | 111% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1215UL is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10900TE as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1215UL |
Intel Core i9-10900TE | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 204 | 199 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1534 | 2115 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 499 | 464 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3492 | 4720 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1176 | 1133 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11522 | 10984 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1215UL |
Intel Core i9-10900TE | Single-Core | 2759 | 2525 | Multi-Core | 16133 | 16545 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1215UL |
Intel Core i9-10900TE | Single-Core | 1133 | 1168 | Multi-Core | 6323 | 7620 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-1215UL |
Intel Core i9-10900TE | Announcement date | September 24, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Embedded | Embedded System | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Alder Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 12 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 1.2 MHz | 1.8 MHz | Cores | 6 | 10 | Threads | 8 | 20 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 35 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 10 MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-10900TE is 33% better than Core i3-1215UL in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-10900TE has 4 more core than Core i3-1215UL. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1215UL is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900TE is better: 22 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-1215UL and Intel Core i9-10900TE before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-1215UL Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300
Intel Core i9-10900TE Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300
| |
|