 |
Intel Core i3-N300 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5825U |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022
If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-N300 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5825U tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, rendering. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, 3DMark, SuperPi, 7zip, Handbrake, Blender, Blender, RealBench, UserBenchmark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 7 5825U or Intel Core i3-N300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-N300 | 54% |
Ryzen 7 5825U | 57% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 7 5825U is 5% better than Core i3-N300. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-N300 | 52% |
Ryzen 7 5825U | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.1 | 95.6 | | Valorant | 104.7 | 108.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 60.9 | | Apex Legends | 98.4 | 102.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 81.5 | | Overwatch | 84.8 | 88.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.2 | 75.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 54.3 | | Warzone | 81.7 | 84.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.0 | 91.3 | | Valheim | 86.9 | 90.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-N300 | 498% |
Ryzen 7 5825U | 337% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N300 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 7 5825U as it consumes less power: 7W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 201 | 209 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1403 | 2084 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 467 | 495 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3172 | 4576 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1079 | 1242 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10430 | 12750 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | | Single-Core | 2510 | 2779 | | Multi-Core | 15340 | 23054 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | | Single-Core | 1047 | 1520 | | Multi-Core | 4058 | 7497 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-N300 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | | Announcement date | January 25, 2023 | February 22, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FP6 | | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Barcelo | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3+ | | Generation | 13 | 6 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.5 MHz | | Frequency | 1.74 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Threads | 8 | 16 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 6200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 15 W | | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | 384KB | 512KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | 4MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 16MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| 100-000000580
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 7 5825U is 13% better than Core i3-N300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N300 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 5825U is better: 27
However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-N300 and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-N300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300U
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
|
|
|
