 |
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Intel Core i3-N300 |
|
Processor comparisons 18-02-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Intel Core i3-N300 and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like AIDA64, Blender, Handbrake, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, 3DMark, Furmark, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, 7zip, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, WPrime, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, Gears 5, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-N300 or AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 5 7640HS | 58% |
Core i3-N300 | 54% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 7640HS is 6% better than Core i3-N300. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 5 7640HS | 56% |
Core i3-N300 | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.1 | 92.1 | | Valorant | 112.6 | 104.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.1 | 58.6 | | Apex Legends | 105.8 | 98.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.4 | 78.5 | | Overwatch | 91.2 | 84.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.7 | 72.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.3 | 52.4 | | Warzone | 87.8 | 81.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.6 | 88.0 | | Valheim | 93.5 | 86.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 5 7640HS | 138% |
Core i3-N300 | 498% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N300 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 7640HS as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 7W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
Intel Core i3-N300 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 194 | 201 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2800 | 1403 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 432 | 467 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6661 | 3172 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1063 | 1079 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18264 | 10430 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
Intel Core i3-N300 | | Single-Core | 2220 | 2510 | | Multi-Core | 29440 | 15340 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
Intel Core i3-N300 | | Single-Core | 1875 | 1047 | | Multi-Core | 10864 | 4058 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
Intel Core i3-N300 | | Announcement date | January 27, 2023 | January 25, 2023 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP7r2;FP7;FP8 | FCBGA1264 | | Core name | Phoenix | Alder Lake-N | | Architecture | Zen 4 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 13 | | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 3.8 MHz | | Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 1.74 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 8 | | Threads | 12 | 8 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 13400 millions | 9800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 7 W | | Memory type | DDR5 (FP7r2) | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 256 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | 384KB | | L2 cache | 6MB | 2MB | | L3 cache | 16MB | 6 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000956 (FP7r2)
100-000000965 (FP7)
100-000001130 (FP8)
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 7640HS is 59% better than Core i3-N300 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-N300 has 2 more core than Ryzen 5 7640HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N300 is better: 10
Although it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS and Intel Core i3-N300 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i3-N300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300U
|
|
|
