 |
Intel Core i3-N300 vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022
Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-N300 vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like WPrime, Prime95, Furmark, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, PassMark, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, 7zip, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, RealBench, 3DMark, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi.
And how good the processors are in games: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U or Intel Core i3-N300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-N300 | 54% |
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U | 55% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is 1% better than Core i3-N300. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-N300 | 52% |
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.1 | 94.5 | | Valorant | 104.7 | 107.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 60.2 | | Apex Legends | 98.4 | 101.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 80.6 | | Overwatch | 84.8 | 87.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.2 | 74.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 53.7 | | Warzone | 81.7 | 83.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.0 | 90.3 | | Valheim | 86.9 | 89.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-N300 | 498% |
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U | 357% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N300 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U as it consumes less power: 7W vs. 15W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 201 | 205 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1403 | 1896 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 467 | 520 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3172 | 4126 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1079 | 1290 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10430 | 10904 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U | | Single-Core | 2510 | | | Multi-Core | 15340 | 19670 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U | | Single-Core | 1047 | 1608 | | Multi-Core | 4058 | 6421 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-N300 |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U | | Announcement date | January 25, 2023 | January 09, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FP6 | | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Cezanne | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 13 | 5 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 1.74 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Threads | 8 | 16 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 6200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 15 W | | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | 384KB | 512KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | 4MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 16MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| 100-000000581
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is 13% better than Core i3-N300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N300 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is better: 26
Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-N300 and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-N300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300U
|
|
|
