 |
Intel Core i3-N300 vs Intel Core i7-1255U |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-N300 vs Intel Core i7-1255U tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning, streaming. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, PCMark 10, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Furmark, 3DMark, Gears 5, SuperPi, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, RealBench.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-1255U or Intel Core i3-N300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-N300 | 54% |
Core i7-1255U | 55% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-1255U is 1% better than Core i3-N300. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-N300 | 52% |
Core i7-1255U | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.1 | 95.1 | | Valorant | 104.7 | 108.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 60.5 | | Apex Legends | 98.4 | 101.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 81.0 | | Overwatch | 84.8 | 87.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.2 | 74.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 54.0 | | Warzone | 81.7 | 84.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.0 | 90.8 | | Valheim | 86.9 | 89.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-N300 | 498% |
Core i7-1255U | 278% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N300 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-1255U since it has less power consumption: 7W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i7-1255U | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 201 | 230 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1403 | 1691 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 467 | 554 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3172 | 3839 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1079 | 1297 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10430 | 12654 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i7-1255U | | Single-Core | 2510 | 3035 | | Multi-Core | 15340 | 17715 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i7-1255U | | Single-Core | 1047 | 1251 | | Multi-Core | 4058 | 6947 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i7-1255U | | Announcement date | January 25, 2023 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Alder Lake-U | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.7 MHz | | Frequency | 1.74 MHz | 1.7 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 10 | | Threads | 8 | 12 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 9800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 15 W | | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | | | L2 cache | 2MB | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 24 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-N300 is 2% better than Core i7-1255U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-1255U has 2 more core than Core i3-N300. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N300 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1255U is better: 25
Although it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-N300 and Intel Core i7-1255U before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-N300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300U
Intel Core i7-1255U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1220PE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
|
|
|
