![Intel Core i3-N300 vs Intel Xeon W-11855M gaming benchmark Intel Core i3-N300 vs Intel Xeon W-11855M gaming benchmark](/imgs/subhead.png) |
Intel Core i3-N300 vs Intel Xeon W-11855M |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022 You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i3-N300 vs Intel Xeon W-11855M and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as RealBench, SuperPi, UserBenchmark, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, PassMark, 3DMark, Blender, Furmark, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, WPrime, Handbrake, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2. And how good the processors are in games: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-11855M or Intel Core i3-N300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-N300 | 54% |
Xeon W-11855M | 54% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-N300 | 52% |
Xeon W-11855M | 54% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.1 | 96.0 | Valorant | 104.7 | 109.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 61.1 | Apex Legends | 98.4 | 102.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 81.8 | Overwatch | 84.8 | 88.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.2 | 75.3 | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 54.6 | Warzone | 81.7 | 85.1 | Assassin's Creed | 88.0 | 91.6 | Valheim | 86.9 | 90.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-N300 | 498% |
Xeon W-11855M | 119% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N300 is more energy efficient than the Xeon W-11855M since it has less power consumption: 7W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Xeon W-11855M | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 201 | 221 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1403 | 1625 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 467 | 203 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3172 | 6280 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1079 | 539 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10430 | 15174 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Xeon W-11855M | Single-Core | 2510 | 3235 | Multi-Core | 15340 | 15444 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Xeon W-11855M | Single-Core | 1047 | 1612 | Multi-Core | 4058 | 7857 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Xeon W-11855M | Announcement date | January 25, 2023 | April 01, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1787 | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Tiger Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.9 MHz | Frequency | 1.74 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 8 | 6 | Threads | 8 | 12 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 2600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | Up to 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 18 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon W-11855M is 45% better than Core i3-N300 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-N300 has 2 more core than Xeon W-11855M. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N300 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-11855M is better: 25 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-N300 and Intel Xeon W-11855M before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-N300 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 3 5125C • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z • Vs Ryzen 3 4300U
Intel Xeon W-11855M Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-N305
| |
|