|
Intel Core i3-N300 vs Intel Core i9-10980HK |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022 If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-N300 vs Intel Core i9-10980HK and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, machine learning, rendering, programming, video editing. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as 7zip, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, PCMark 10, Handbrake, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, WPrime, Blender, RealBench, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Gears 5, Furmark, PassMark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10980HK or Intel Core i3-N300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-N300 | 54% |
Core i9-10980HK | 55% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-10980HK is 1% better than Core i3-N300. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-N300 | 52% |
Core i9-10980HK | 55% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.1 | 97.2 | Valorant | 104.7 | 110.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 61.9 | Apex Legends | 98.4 | 103.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 82.9 | Overwatch | 84.8 | 89.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.2 | 76.2 | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 55.2 | Warzone | 81.7 | 86.2 | Assassin's Creed | 88.0 | 92.8 | Valheim | 86.9 | 91.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-N300 | 498% |
Core i9-10980HK | 106% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N300 is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10980HK since it has less power consumption: 7W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 201 | 219 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1403 | 1627 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 467 | 507 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3172 | 3643 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1079 | 1136 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10430 | 11013 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | Single-Core | 2510 | 2913 | Multi-Core | 15340 | 16588 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | Single-Core | 1047 | 1437 | Multi-Core | 4058 | 9056 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-N300 |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | Announcement date | January 25, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 5.3 MHz | Frequency | 1.74 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Threads | 8 | 16 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 2100 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 16 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-10980HK is 27% better than Core i3-N300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N300 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10980HK is better: 25 Although it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-N300 and Intel Core i9-10980HK before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-N300 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 3 5125C • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z • Vs Ryzen 3 4300U
Intel Core i9-10980HK Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
| |
|