 |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H vs Intel Xeon W-3275M |
|
Processor comparisons 11-01-2022 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H vs Intel Xeon W-3275M and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering, programming. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, WPrime, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, PCMark 10, PassMark, Blender, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, Prime95, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, Furmark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-3275M or AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H | 60% |
Xeon W-3275M | 61% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon W-3275M is 1% better than Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H | 55% |
Xeon W-3275M | 62% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 97.6 | 109.5 | Valorant | 110.9 | 124.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 62.1 | 69.7 | Apex Legends | 104.3 | 117.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 83.2 | 93.3 | Overwatch | 89.8 | 100.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 76.5 | 85.9 | DOOM Eternal | 55.5 | 62.2 | Warzone | 86.5 | 97.1 | Assassin's Creed | 93.2 | 104.5 | Valheim | 92.1 | 103.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H | 115% |
Xeon W-3275M | 19% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is more energy efficient than the Xeon W-3275M as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 205W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 313 | 232 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3027 | 6801 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 728 | 437 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6637 | 11020 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1807 | 1107 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18470 | 28051 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | Single-Core | 4035 | 2721 | Multi-Core | 33392 | 39359 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | Single-Core | 1561 | 1199 | Multi-Core | 9408 | 21098 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | Announcement date | January 07, 2022 | January 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Server | Socket | FP7 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Rembrandt | Cascade Lake | Architecture | Zen 3+ | x86 | Generation | 6 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4.4 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 8 | 28 | Threads | 16 | 56 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 7200 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 205 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | 512KB | | L2 cache | 4MB | | L3 cache | 16MB | 38.5 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | FP7: 100-000000542 FP7r2: 100-000000564
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is 21% better than Xeon W-3275M in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon W-3275M has 20 more core than Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-3275M is better: 23 Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H and Intel Xeon W-3275M before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Xeon W-3275M Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|