Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Intel Core i5-13500 vs Intel Xeon W-3275M gaming benchmark

Intel Core i5-13500 vs Intel Xeon W-3275M

Processor comparisons   12-10-2022
   Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-13500 vs Intel Xeon W-3275M tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing, rendering. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Blender, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, WPrime, 3DMark, SuperPi, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, Furmark, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, MATLAB.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • Apex Legends
  • Fortnite
  • Death Stranding
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Last Man Standing
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Halo Infinite
  • Fallout 76
  • Valheim
  • Overwatch
  • Valorant
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Borderlands 3

   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-3275M or Intel Core i5-13500.

 
Intel Core i5-13500
Intel Xeon W-3275M

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
Core i5-1350061% Xeon W-3275M61%


Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
Core i5-1350059% Xeon W-3275M62%
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite104.0109.5
Valorant118.2124.5
Cyberpunk 207766.269.7
Apex Legends111.1117.0
Call of Duty Warzone88.693.3
Overwatch95.7100.8
Red Dead Redemption 281.685.9
DOOM Eternal59.162.2
Warzone92.297.1
Assassin's Creed99.3104.5
Valheim98.1103.3
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
Core i5-1350094% Xeon W-3275M19%
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13500 is more energy efficient than the Xeon W-3275M as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 205W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

For example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
Intel Core i5-13500 Intel Xeon W-3275M
Cinbench 15 Single-core336232
Cinbench 15 Multi-core33536801
Cinbench 20 Single-core549437
Cinbench 20 Multi-core743411020
Cinbench 23 Single-core18951107
Cinbench 23 Multi-core2136028051

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core i5-13500 Intel Xeon W-3275M
Single-Core17322721
Multi-Core3639439359

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core i5-13500 Intel Xeon W-3275M
Single-Core18461199
Multi-Core1569421098

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

Intel Core i5-13500 Intel Xeon W-3275M
Announcement dateSeptember 23, 2022January 01, 2020
TypeDesktopServer
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA3647
Core nameRaptor LakeCascade Lake
Architecturex86x86
Generation133
Turbo Frequency4.8 MHz4.4 MHz
Frequency2.5 MHz2.5 MHz
Cores1428
Threads2056
Bus rate16 GT/s8 GT/s
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm14 nm
Transistors count14200 millions7510 millions
Power consumption (TDP)65 W205 W
Memory typeUp to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/sDDR4-2933
Max. Memory128 Gb2 Gb
Memory Frequency4800
Memory bandwidth68 GB/s
L1 cache2 MB
L2 cache4 MB
L3 cache20 MB38.5 MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoYes
Part number
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Xeon W-3275M has 14 more core than Core i5-13500. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500 is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-3275M is better: 22
   However, it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13500 and Intel Xeon W-3275M before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13500 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
Intel Xeon W-3275M - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


Intel Core i5-13500 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Core i7-12700HL
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D


Intel Xeon W-3275M Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-12700HL
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands