|
Intel Xeon W-3275M vs Intel Core i9-10980XE |
|
Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon W-3275M vs Intel Core i9-10980XE and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, machine learning, rendering, programming, video editing. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Handbrake, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, MATLAB, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, AIDA64, PassMark, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Blender, RealBench, WPrime, Gears 5. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10980XE or Intel Xeon W-3275M.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon W-3275M | 61% |
Core i9-10980XE | 60% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon W-3275M is 1% better than Core i9-10980XE. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon W-3275M | 62% |
Core i9-10980XE | 61% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Control, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 109.5 | 108.7 | Valorant | 124.5 | 123.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.7 | 69.2 | Apex Legends | 117.0 | 116.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 93.3 | 92.6 | Overwatch | 100.8 | 100.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85.9 | 85.2 | DOOM Eternal | 62.2 | 61.8 | Warzone | 97.1 | 96.3 | Assassin's Creed | 104.5 | 103.7 | Valheim | 103.3 | 102.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon W-3275M | 19% |
Core i9-10980XE | 28% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-10980XE is more energy efficient than the Xeon W-3275M since it has less power consumption: 205W vs. 165W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon W-3275M |
Intel Core i9-10980XE | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 232 | 211 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6801 | 3800 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 437 | 480 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11020 | 8848 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1107 | 1191 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28051 | 24309 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon W-3275M |
Intel Core i9-10980XE | Single-Core | 2721 | 2626 | Multi-Core | 39359 | 34005 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon W-3275M |
Intel Core i9-10980XE | Single-Core | 1199 | 1417 | Multi-Core | 21098 | 20280 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon W-3275M |
Intel Core i9-10980XE | Announcement date | January 01, 2020 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA3647 | FCLGA2066 | Core name | Cascade Lake | Cascade Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 3 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4.8 MHz | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 28 | 18 | Threads | 56 | 36 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s DMI3 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 7510 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 205 W | 165 W | Memory type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 256 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 94 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 38.5 MB | 24.75 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-10980XE is 16% better than Xeon W-3275M in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon W-3275M has 10 more core than Core i9-10980XE. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-3275M is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10980XE is better: 12 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon W-3275M and Intel Core i9-10980XE before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon W-3275M Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Core i9-10980XE Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
| |
|