 |
AMD EPYC 7552 vs Intel Xeon W-3275M |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7552 vs Intel Xeon W-3275M tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, rendering, programming. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, Blender, PCMark 10, AIDA64, Blender, Gears 5, MATLAB, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, PassMark, SuperPi, Prime95, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Handbrake.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-3275M or AMD EPYC 7552.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7552 | 72% |
Xeon W-3275M | 61% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7552 is 15% better than Xeon W-3275M. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7552 | 77% |
Xeon W-3275M | 62% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Control, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 137.0 | 109.5 | | Valorant | 155.7 | 124.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 87.2 | 69.7 | | Apex Legends | 146.3 | 117.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 116.8 | 93.3 | | Overwatch | 126.1 | 100.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 107.4 | 85.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 77.8 | 62.2 | | Warzone | 121.4 | 97.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 130.8 | 104.5 | | Valheim | 129.2 | 103.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7552 | 18% |
Xeon W-3275M | 19% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon W-3275M is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7552 as it consumes less power: 200W vs. 205W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 213 | 232 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8977 | 6801 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 528 | 437 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 19032 | 11020 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1001 | 1107 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49501 | 28051 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | | Single-Core | 2844 | 2721 | | Multi-Core | 72727 | 39359 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | | Single-Core | 1082 | 1199 | | Multi-Core | 48030 | 21098 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7552 |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | January 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA3647 | | Core name | Rome | Cascade Lake | | Architecture | Zen 2 | x86 | | Generation | 2 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 2.5 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 28 | | Threads | 96 | 56 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 7510 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 205 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | | 2 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 192MB | 38.5 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000076
100-100000076WOF | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon W-3275M is 11% better than EPYC 7552 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7552 has 20 more core than Xeon W-3275M. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7552 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-3275M is better: 10
However, it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7552 and Intel Xeon W-3275M before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7552 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon W-3275M Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-12700HL
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
