|
Intel Core i9-12900F vs Intel Xeon W-3275M |
|
Processor comparisons 10-01-2022 If you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests Intel Core i9-12900F vs Intel Xeon W-3275M and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, 7zip, Furmark, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, SuperPi, PassMark, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, 3DMark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-3275M or Intel Core i9-12900F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-12900F | 65% |
Xeon W-3275M | 61% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900F is 6% better than Xeon W-3275M. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-12900F | 59% |
Xeon W-3275M | 62% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 104.5 | 109.5 | Valorant | 118.8 | 124.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.5 | 69.7 | Apex Legends | 111.6 | 117.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 89.1 | 93.3 | Overwatch | 96.2 | 100.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.9 | 85.9 | DOOM Eternal | 59.4 | 62.2 | Warzone | 92.6 | 97.1 | Assassin's Creed | 99.8 | 104.5 | Valheim | 98.6 | 103.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-12900F | 97% |
Xeon W-3275M | 19% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900F is more energy efficient than the Xeon W-3275M since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 205W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900F |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 449 | 232 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4734 | 6801 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 750 | 437 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10524 | 11020 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2661 | 1107 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30285 | 28051 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900F |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | Single-Core | 6936 | 2721 | Multi-Core | 51775 | 39359 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900F |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | Single-Core | 1904 | 1199 | Multi-Core | 16188 | 21098 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-12900F |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | Announcement date | July 21, 2021 | January 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Alder Lake | Cascade Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 12 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 MHz | 4.4 MHz | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 16 | 28 | Threads | 24 | 56 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 12600 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 205 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 12 MB | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 38.5 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900F is 34% better than Xeon W-3275M in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon W-3275M has 12 more core than Core i9-12900F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900F is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-3275M is better: 19 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-12900F and Intel Xeon W-3275M before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-12900F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Intel Xeon W-3275M Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|