AMD EPYC 9454P vs Intel Xeon W-3275M

Processor comparisons   15-03-2023
   For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 9454P vs Intel Xeon W-3275M and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like MATLAB, Blender, RealBench, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, Furmark, PCMark 10, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, AIDA64, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, 7zip, 3DMark.
   And how good the processors are in games:

Red Dead Redemption 2
Halo Infinite
Apex Legends
Borderlands 3
Valheim
Rainbow Six Siege
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Watch Dogs Legion
Overwatch
Death Stranding
Last Man Standing
Valorant
Fallout 76
Fortnite
Grand Theft Auto V
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
Cyberpunk 2077
DOOM: Eternal

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-3275M or AMD EPYC 9454P.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

EPYC 9454P

73%

Xeon W-3275M

61%

This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9454P is 16% better than Xeon W-3275M. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

EPYC 9454P

80%

Xeon W-3275M

62%

The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	142.3	109.5
Valorant	161.7	124.5
Cyberpunk 2077	90.6	69.7
Apex Legends	152.0	117.0
Call of Duty Warzone	121.3	93.3
Overwatch	131.0	100.8
Red Dead Redemption 2	111.6	85.9
DOOM Eternal	80.9	62.2
Warzone	126.2	97.1
Assassin's Creed	135.9	104.5
Valheim	134.2	103.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

EPYC 9454P

17%

Xeon W-3275M

19%

To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon W-3275M is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9454P since it has less power consumption: 290W vs. 205W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

For example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	AMD EPYC 9454P	Intel Xeon W-3275M
Cinbench 15 Single-core	213	232
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	9744	6801
Cinbench 20 Single-core	421	437
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	20676	11020
Cinbench 23 Single-core	1073	1107
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	53807	28051

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 9454P	Intel Xeon W-3275M
Single-Core	2439	2721
Multi-Core	78937	39359

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 9454P	Intel Xeon W-3275M
Single-Core	1540	1199
Multi-Core	53258	21098

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

	AMD EPYC 9454P	Intel Xeon W-3275M
Announcement date	November 10, 2022	January 01, 2020
Type	Server	Server
Socket	SP5	FCLGA3647
Core name	Genoa	Cascade Lake
Architecture	Zen 4	x86
Generation	4	3
Turbo Frequency	3.8 MHz	4.4 MHz
Frequency	2.75 MHz	2.5 MHz
Cores	48	28
Threads	96	56
Bus rate		8 GT/s
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	14 nm
Transistors count	64000 millions	7510 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	290 W	205 W
Memory type	DDR5	DDR4-2933
Max. Memory	4096 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	4800
Memory bandwidth	460.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	256MB	38.5 MB
Overclocking	No	No
Supports ECC	Yes	Yes
Part number	100-000000873 100-000000873WOF

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9454P is 9% better than Xeon W-3275M in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9454P has 20 more core than Xeon W-3275M. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9454P is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-3275M is better: 8
However, it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9454P and Intel Xeon W-3275M before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.

AMD EPYC 9454P - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 9454P specs and review.

Intel Xeon W-3275M - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• Intel Xeon W-3275M specs and review.