|
Qualcomm QCM2290 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 |
|
Comparisons 17-02-2023 Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm QCM2290 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like AnTuTu, 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, and how good the chips are in games Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy QCM2290 or Exynos 7 Octa 7580.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreQCM2290 | 5% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7580 | 3% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)QCM2290 | 70% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7580 | 25% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingQCM2290 | 2% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7580 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | QCM2290 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7580 | Total score | 70836 | 43687 | CPU | 19837 | 12230 | GPU | 26918 | 16597 | MEM | 11330 | 6985 | UX | 12757 | 7870 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | QCM2290 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7580 | Single-Core | 183 | 116 | Multi-Core | 825 | 534 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | QCM2290 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7580 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1600 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 11 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 8x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1804 | 1650 | Memory bandwidth | 12.8 | 7 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 384 KB | L2 cache | | 512 KB | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCM2290 is 19% better than Exynos 7 Octa 7580 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that QCM2290 has 4 more core than Exynos 7 Octa 7580. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 702 | Mali-T720 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 845 MHz | 600 MHz | GFloPS | 18.23 | 20.4 | # of Cores | | 2 | # of Shader Units | 768 | | Display | 1680 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 13.1 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 16.6 | 35.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 26.2 | 23.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 17.6 | 20.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 13.1 | 29.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 17.4 | 44.7 | Real Racing 3 | 32.6 | 46.8 | Sniper 3D | 57.1 | 44.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 31.8 | 32.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 29.2 | 33.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 36.3 | 25.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 25 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Dual ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8 |
Networks and NavigationModem | QCM2290 LTE modem | LTE Cat.6 2CA | Download speed | 450 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | QZSS, Galileo, Beidou, SBAS, GLONASS, NavIC, GPS | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCM2290 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 is better: 17 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
QCM2290 SoC Comparisons • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Apple A9 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
Exynos 7 Octa 7580 SoC Comparisons • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
| |
|