MediaTek MT6739WW vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6739WW vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and PowerVR GE8100.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6739WW is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 7 Octa 7580 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, Octane V2, 3DMark, Neocore, Quadrant, AnTuTu 8, Geekbench, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, and how good the chipsets are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy MT6739WW or Exynos 7 Octa 7580 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6739WW

Exynos 7 Octa 7580

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6739WW

29%

Exynos 7 Octa 7580

25%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6739WW

Exynos 7 Octa 7580

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6739WW	Exynos 7 Octa 7580
Total score	35685	43687
CPU	9986	12230
GPU	13560	16597
MEM	5708	6985
UX	6433	7870

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6739WW	Exynos 7 Octa 7580
Single-Core	94	116
Multi-Core	436	534

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6739WW	Exynos 7 Octa 7580
Frequency	1500 MHz	1600 MHz
Cores	4	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	8x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	4 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	3 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	1650
Memory bandwidth	4	7
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Octa 7580 is 6% better than MT6739WW in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6739WW has 4 more core than Exynos 7 Octa 7580. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8100	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	570 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	11.2	20.4
# of Cores	1	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1440 x 720 pixels	1920 x 1200 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	11.2	13.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	28.3	35.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	18.6	23.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	15.4	20.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	24.4	29.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	36.8	44.7
Real Racing 3	37.2	46.8
Sniper 3D	29.8	44.5
Need for Speed No Limits	29.8	32.8
Mortal Kombat X	27	33.9
CSR Racing 2	22.3	25.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.6 2CA
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6739WW is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 is better: 34
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets MT6739WW and Exynos 7 Octa 7580, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6739WW SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6739WW specs and review.

Exynos 7 Octa 7580 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Exynos 7 Octa 7580 specs and review.