HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-450 MP4.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 620 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 7 Octa 7580 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, Geekbench, Neocore, Octane V2, PassMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy Kirin 620 or Exynos 7 Octa 7580 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 620

Exynos 7 Octa 7580

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 620

24%

Exynos 7 Octa 7580

25%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 620

Exynos 7 Octa 7580

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 620	Exynos 7 Octa 7580
Total score	33885	43687
CPU	9480	12230
GPU	12867	16597
MEM	5430	6985
UX	6089	7870

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 620	Exynos 7 Octa 7580
Single-Core	90	116
Multi-Core	414	534

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 620	Exynos 7 Octa 7580
Frequency	1200 MHz	1600 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	8x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	8x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	4 W
Memory type	LPDDR3x	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	1650
Memory bandwidth	28	7
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	64 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	4 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	4 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Octa 7580 is 25% better than Kirin 620 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-450 MP4	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	29.81	20.4
# of Cores	4	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1920 x 1200 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	11.9	13.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	28.4	35.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	19.1	23.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	17.4	20.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	23.5	29.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	35.4	44.7
Real Racing 3	38.2	46.8
Sniper 3D	24.8	44.5
Need for Speed No Limits	22.9	32.8
Mortal Kombat X	24.8	33.9
CSR Racing 2	24.8	25.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.6 2CA
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 620 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 is better: 26
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Kirin 620 and Exynos 7 Octa 7580, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Kirin 620 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 620 specs and review.

Exynos 7 Octa 7580 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Exynos 7 Octa 7580 specs and review.