Comparisons 24-08-2021 Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs Apple M1, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like 3DMark, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, Geekbench, PCMark, Quadrant, Neocore, AnTuTu, and how good the CPUs are in games Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 888 Plus or M1.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 888 Plus | 99% |
M1 | 99% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 888 Plus | 87% |
M1 | 99% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 888 Plus | 98% |
M1 | 99% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
M1 | Total score | 897046 | 1204017 | CPU | 268491 | 179367 | GPU | 334895 | 371998 | MEM | 153388 | 95242 | UX | 139755 | 75217 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
M1 | Single-Core | 1250 | 1807 | Multi-Core | 3945 | 7691 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
M1 | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 3200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | | 16000 millions | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Kryo 680 Prime 3x2.4 GHz Kryo 680 Gold 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 680 Silver | 4x3.2 GHz Firestorm 4x2.0 GHz Icestorm | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4X | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 2666 | Memory bandwidth | 64 | 64 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 512 KB | 48 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 12 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M1 is 6% better than Snapdragon 888 Plus in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 660 | Apple M1 | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 3200 MHz | GFloPS | 1486 | 2600 | # of Cores | | 8 | # of Shader Units | 512 | 128 | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 2732 x 2048 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | Real Racing 3 | | | Sniper 3D | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | CSR Racing 2 | | | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 24 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | Apple ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 960 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | Snapdragon X80 5G | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 9500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 6000 MBit/s. | Navigation | GNSS, NavIC enabled, Dual frequency GNSS, Galileo, NavIC, SBAS, GLONASS, Beidou, GPS, QZSS | Galileo, GLONASS, GPS, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus is better: 12
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 is better: 15 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Apple M1 • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Apple M1 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Apple M1 • MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Apple M1 • MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Vs Apple M1
|