Comparisons 24-08-2021
Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 820, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Vellamo, 3DMark, PCMark, Geekbench, GFXBench, AnTuTu, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Madout2, GTA, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 888 Plus or Dimensity 820.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 888 Plus | 99% |
Dimensity 820 | 81% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 888 Plus | 87% |
Dimensity 820 | 73% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 888 Plus | 98% |
Dimensity 820 | 74% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
Dimensity 820 | | Total score | 897046 | 418747 | | CPU | 268491 | 135989 | | GPU | 334895 | 116434 | | MEM | 153388 | 88895 | | UX | 139755 | 77760 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
Dimensity 820 | | Single-Core | 1250 | 897 | | Multi-Core | 3945 | 2961 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
Dimensity 820 | | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Kryo 680 Prime
3x2.4 GHz Kryo 680 Gold
4x1.8 GHz Kryo 680 Silver | 4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 64 | 17.07 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.3-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 888 Plus is 13% better than Dimensity 820 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G57 MP5 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 850 MHz | | GFloPS | 1486 | 705.5 | | # of Cores | | 5 | | # of Shader Units | 512 | | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 30.7 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 47.4 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 57.4 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 39.8 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 38.2 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 58.1 | | Real Racing 3 | | 71.8 | | Sniper 3D | | 109.1 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 68.9 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 66 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 74.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 80 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 32 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GNSS, NavIC enabled, Dual frequency GNSS, Galileo, NavIC, SBAS, GLONASS, Beidou, GPS, QZSS | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus is better: 26
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 820 is better: 15
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Dimensity 820
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Samsung Exynos 1080 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Apple A12X Bionic Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
|
