Comparisons 27-05-2022 Detailed compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like PCMark, Neocore, Geekbench, Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu, and how good the processors are in games Call of Duty, Madout2, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Dimensity 1050 or Snapdragon 888 Plus.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreDimensity 1050 | 87% |
Snapdragon 888 Plus | 99% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Dimensity 1050 | 83% |
Snapdragon 888 Plus | 87% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingDimensity 1050 | 96% |
Snapdragon 888 Plus | 98% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 1050 |
Snapdragon 888 Plus | Total score | 574847 | 897046 | CPU | 163368 | 268491 | GPU | 139627 | 334895 | MEM | 106600 | 153388 | UX | 93142 | 139755 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 1050 |
Snapdragon 888 Plus | Single-Core | 1223 | 1250 | Multi-Core | 3794 | 3945 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 1050 |
Snapdragon 888 Plus | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 3000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 5600 millions | | Core configuration | 4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.0 GHz Kryo 680 Prime 3x2.4 GHz Kryo 680 Gold 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 680 Silver | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 29 | 64 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 32 KB | 512 KB | L2 cache | 320 KB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 888 Plus is 16% better than Dimensity 1050 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G610 MC3 | Adreno 660 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 1008 | 1486 | # of Cores | 3 | | # of Shader Units | | 512 | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | Real Racing 3 | | | Sniper 3D | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | CSR Racing 2 | | | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 108 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | Navigation | BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a | GNSS, NavIC enabled, Dual frequency GNSS, Galileo, NavIC, SBAS, GLONASS, Beidou, GPS, QZSS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1050 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus is better: 23 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Google Tensor
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
|