Comparisons 14-05-2021
Detailed comparison data of Apple M1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as PCMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, Quadrant, and how good the chipsets are in games Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, GTA, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy M1 or Snapdragon 865.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | M1 |
Snapdragon 865 | | Total score | 1204017 | 583551 | | CPU | 179367 | 185770 | | GPU | 371998 | 217771 | | MEM | 95242 | 105311 | | UX | 75217 | 95677 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | M1 |
Snapdragon 865 | | Single-Core | 1807 | 934 | | Multi-Core | 7691 | 3435 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | M1 |
Snapdragon 865 | | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2840 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 16000 millions | | | Core configuration | 4x3.2 GHz Firestorm
4x2.0 GHz Icestorm | 8x2.84 GHz Kryo 585 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4X | 4x16bit, LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2666 | 2750 | | Memory bandwidth | 64 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 48 KB | 512 KB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M1 is 11% better than Snapdragon 865 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Apple M1 | Adreno 650 | | GPU Frequency | 3200 MHz | 600 MHz | | GFloPS | 2600 | 989 | | # of Cores | 8 | | | # of Shader Units | 128 | 512 | | Display | 2732 x 2048 pixels | 2840 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 29.4 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 62.8 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 58.6 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 59.2 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 49.6 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 76.5 | | Real Racing 3 | | 73.3 | | Sniper 3D | | 111.3 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 93.8 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 85 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 70.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 24 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 24 MP | 25 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Apple ISP | Qualcomm Spectra 480 | | Video Encoding FPS | 960 | 960 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Snapdragon X80 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G | | Download speed | 9500 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo, GLONASS, GPS, Beidou | SBAS, NavIC enabled, Galileo, GPS, GNSS, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 is better: 22
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Snapdragon 865
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
|
