Comparisons 14-05-2021
Comprehensive testing data of Apple M1 vs Apple A14 Bionic, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Neocore, AnTuTu, PCMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, Geekbench, GFXBench, PassMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of chips in PUBG, Madout2, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy M1 or A14 Bionic.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | M1 |
A14 Bionic | | Total score | 1204017 | 571583 | | CPU | 179367 | 177628 | | GPU | 371998 | 207069 | | MEM | 95242 | 110157 | | UX | 75217 | 101843 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | M1 |
A14 Bionic | | Single-Core | 1807 | 1621 | | Multi-Core | 7691 | 4180 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | M1 |
A14 Bionic | | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 6 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 16000 millions | 11800000 millions | | Core configuration | 4x3.2 GHz Firestorm
4x2.0 GHz Icestorm | 8x3 GHz Icestorm
4x1.8 GHz Firestorm | | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 6 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2666 | 4266 | | Memory bandwidth | 64 | 42.7 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 48 KB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M1 is 6% better than A14 Bionic in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M1 has -2 more core than A14 Bionic. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Apple M1 | Apple A14 Bionic | | GPU Frequency | 3200 MHz | 3000 MHz | | GFloPS | 2600 | 1480 | | # of Cores | 8 | 4 | | # of Shader Units | 128 | | | Display | 2732 x 2048 pixels | 2732 x 2048 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 28.8 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 60.9 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 56.3 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 57.5 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 47.5 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 74.8 | | Real Racing 3 | | 98.5 | | Sniper 3D | | 73.2 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 67.6 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 73.2 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 67.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 24 MP | 12 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 24 MP | 12 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Apple ISP | Apple ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 960 | 960 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Snapdragon X80 5G | Snapdragon X60 5G | | Download speed | 9500 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo, GLONASS, GPS, Beidou | Beidou, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 is better: 20
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic is better: 16
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Apple M1
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Apple M1
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Apple M1
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Apple M1
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Snapdragon 875 Vs A14 Bionic
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
|
