Comparisons 24-08-2021
Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PassMark, GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Quadrant, 3DMark, Geekbench, and how good the chipsets are in games Fortnite, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 888 Plus or Dimensity 1200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 888 Plus | 99% |
Dimensity 1200 | 95% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 888 Plus | 87% |
Dimensity 1200 | 87% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 888 Plus | 98% |
Dimensity 1200 | 89% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
Dimensity 1200 | | Total score | 897046 | 634362 | | CPU | 268491 | 163368 | | GPU | 334895 | 139627 | | MEM | 153388 | 106600 | | UX | 139755 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
Dimensity 1200 | | Single-Core | 1250 | 1349 | | Multi-Core | 3945 | 4187 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
Dimensity 1200 | | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | | 5800 millions | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Kryo 680 Prime
3x2.4 GHz Kryo 680 Gold
4x1.8 GHz Kryo 680 Silver | 1x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
3x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4266 | | Memory bandwidth | 64 | 29 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 320 KB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G77 MC9 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 800 MHz | | GFloPS | 1486 | 504 | | # of Cores | | 9 | | # of Shader Units | 512 | | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 28.8 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 71.4 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 98.5 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 55.5 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 61.6 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 89.5 | | Real Racing 3 | | 197 | | Sniper 3D | | 216.7 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 157.6 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 157.6 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 137.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 32 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GNSS, NavIC enabled, Dual frequency GNSS, Galileo, NavIC, SBAS, GLONASS, Beidou, GPS, QZSS | Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus is better: 18
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1200 is better: 20
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
|
