Comparisons 24-08-2021
Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, PassMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of processors in Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy Snapdragon 888 Plus or Dimensity 1000C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 888 Plus | 99% |
Dimensity 1000C | 83% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 888 Plus | 87% |
Dimensity 1000C | 72% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 888 Plus | 98% |
Dimensity 1000C | 77% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
Dimensity 1000C | | Total score | 897046 | 430976 | | CPU | 268491 | 139771 | | GPU | 334895 | 119922 | | MEM | 153388 | 91505 | | UX | 139755 | 79700 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
Dimensity 1000C | | Single-Core | 1250 | 923 | | Multi-Core | 3945 | 3047 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
Dimensity 1000C | | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Kryo 680 Prime
3x2.4 GHz Kryo 680 Gold
4x1.8 GHz Kryo 680 Silver | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 1866 | | Memory bandwidth | 64 | 29.87 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.3-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 888 Plus is 33% better than Dimensity 1000C in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G57 MP5 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 850 MHz | | GFloPS | 1486 | 705.5 | | # of Cores | | 5 | | # of Shader Units | 512 | | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 27.1 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 55.6 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 57.3 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 41.8 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 46.9 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 76.6 | | Real Racing 3 | | 86 | | Sniper 3D | | 74.5 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 68.8 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 83.1 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 63 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 64 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 32 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 4600 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GNSS, NavIC enabled, Dual frequency GNSS, Galileo, NavIC, SBAS, GLONASS, Beidou, GPS, QZSS | BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus is better: 24
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1000C is better: 15
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Dimensity 1000C
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
|
