Comparisons 14-05-2021
Comprehensive testing data of Apple M1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, Geekbench 5, Neocore, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy M1 or Dimensity 1000L.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | M1 |
Dimensity 1000L | | Total score | 1204017 | 522216 | | CPU | 179367 | 169526 | | GPU | 371998 | 145302 | | MEM | 95242 | 110751 | | UX | 75217 | 96565 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | M1 |
Dimensity 1000L | | Single-Core | 1807 | 1111 | | Multi-Core | 7691 | 3446 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | M1 |
Dimensity 1000L | | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 16000 millions | | | Core configuration | 4x3.2 GHz Firestorm
4x2.0 GHz Icestorm | 4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2666 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 64 | 29.87 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 48 KB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M1 is 18% better than Dimensity 1000L in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Apple M1 | Mali-G77 MC9 | | GPU Frequency | 3200 MHz | 800 MHz | | GFloPS | 2600 | 504 | | # of Cores | 8 | 9 | | # of Shader Units | 128 | | | Display | 2732 x 2048 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 25.1 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 54.6 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 51.3 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 52.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 42.9 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 67.9 | | Real Racing 3 | | 102.6 | | Sniper 3D | | 112.9 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 61.6 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 66.7 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 71.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 24 MP | 80 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 24 MP | 32 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Apple ISP | | | Video Encoding FPS | 960 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Snapdragon X80 5G | 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 9500 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo, GLONASS, GPS, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 is better: 26
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1000L is better: 17
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Dimensity 1000L
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Samsung Exynos 1080 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Samsung Exynos 2100 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
|
