MediaTek Kompanio 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus

Comparisons 30-08-2022

Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Kompanio 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Quadrant, PCMark, AnTuTu, Geekbench, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, and how good the processors are in games GTA, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Minecraft, PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 1380 or Snapdragon 888 Plus.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Kompanio 1380

46%

Snapdragon 888 Plus

64%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Kompanio 1380

80%

Snapdragon 888 Plus

80%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Kompanio 1380

45%

Snapdragon 888 Plus

62%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Kompanio 1380	Snapdragon 888 Plus
Total score	645918	897046
CPU	180858	251179
GPU	245447	340878
MEM	103349	143532
UX	116272	161476

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Kompanio 1380	Snapdragon 888 Plus
Single-Core	1217	1250
Multi-Core	3486	3945

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Kompanio 1380	Snapdragon 888 Plus
Frequency	3000 MHz	3000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions
Core configuration	4x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x3.0 GHz Kryo 680 Prime 3x2.4 GHz Kryo 680 Gold 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 680 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory	32 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	3200
Memory bandwidth	32	64
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	32 KB	512 KB
L2 cache	320 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MC5	Adreno 660
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	630.15	1486
# of Cores	5
# of Shader Units		512
Display	3840 x 2160 pixels	3840 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	30.7	33.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	73.2	106.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	101.9	62.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	56.7	58.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	62.4	90.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	92.4	131.1
Real Racing 3	126.4	127.2
Sniper 3D	161.1	140.4
Need for Speed No Limits	141.1	89.7
Mortal Kombat X	116.7	91.8
CSR Racing 2	141.3	77.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	64 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 580
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	7500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	3000 MBit/s.
Navigation	BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, NavIC	GNSS, NavIC enabled, Dual frequency GNSS, Galileo, NavIC, SBAS, GLONASS, Beidou, GPS, QZSS
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 1380 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus is better: 25
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Kompanio 1380 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 1380 specs and review.

Snapdragon 888 Plus SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 888 Plus specs and review.