Comparisons 24-08-2021
Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs Apple A12X Bionic, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like AnTuTu, PassMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, GFXBench, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, PCMark, and how good the SoCs are in games PUBG, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Snapdragon 888 Plus or A12X Bionic.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 888 Plus | 99% |
A12X Bionic | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 888 Plus | 87% |
A12X Bionic | 99% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 888 Plus | 98% |
A12X Bionic | 97% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
A12X Bionic | | Total score | 897046 | 673441 | | CPU | 268491 | 188899 | | GPU | 334895 | 344837 | | MEM | 153388 | 65022 | | UX | 139755 | 77176 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
A12X Bionic | | Single-Core | 1250 | 1152 | | Multi-Core | 3945 | 4435 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
A12X Bionic | | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2490 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | 10000 millions | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Kryo 680 Prime
3x2.4 GHz Kryo 680 Gold
4x1.8 GHz Kryo 680 Silver | 4x2.49GHz Vortex
4x1.6 GHz Tempest | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4X | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 64 | 42 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | 48 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 888 Plus is 17% better than A12X Bionic in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 660 | Apple A12X Bionic | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 2500 MHz | | GFloPS | 1486 | 1360 | | # of Cores | | 7 | | # of Shader Units | 512 | | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 2732 x 2048 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 26.6 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 79.8 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 48.9 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 44.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 68.1 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 99.3 | | Real Racing 3 | | 85.6 | | Sniper 3D | | 63.6 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 78.2 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 56.2 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 63.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 12 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 12 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | Apple ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 960 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | Intel XMM 7560 LTE | | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 1000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 350 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GNSS, NavIC enabled, Dual frequency GNSS, Galileo, NavIC, SBAS, GLONASS, Beidou, GPS, QZSS | Galileo, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic is better: 21
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Snapdragon 875 Vs A12X Bionic
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Samsung Exynos 1080 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
|
