Comparisons 13-07-2022
Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Apple M1, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like PassMark, Neocore, PCMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of processors in PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus or M1.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | 98% |
M1 | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | 93% |
M1 | 99% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | 95% |
M1 | 99% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus |
M1 | | Total score | 1062639 | 1204017 | | CPU | 163368 | 179367 | | GPU | 139627 | 371998 | | MEM | 106600 | 95242 | | UX | 93142 | 75217 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus |
M1 | | Single-Core | 1215 | 1807 | | Multi-Core | 4417 | 7691 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus |
M1 | | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 8400 millions | 16000 millions | | Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-X2
3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 4x3.2 GHz Firestorm
4x2.0 GHz Icestorm | | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 5 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5x | LPDDR4X | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | 2666 | | Memory bandwidth | 52 | 64 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 48 KB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 32 MB | 12 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Apple M1 | | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 3200 MHz | | GFloPS | 1648 | 2600 | | # of Cores | 10 | 8 | | # of Shader Units | | 128 | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2732 x 2048 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 320 MP | 24 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 24 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Apple ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 960 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Snapdragon X80 5G | | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 9500 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 6000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C | Galileo, GLONASS, GPS, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 is better: 18
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Vs Apple M1
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Apple M1
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Apple M1
|
