Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Unisoc Tiger T820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus benchmark which processor is better

Unisoc Tiger T820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus

Comparisons   22-06-2023
   Comprehensive testing data of Unisoc Tiger T820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, PassMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of chips in Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, Minecraft, PUBG etc.
   After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Tiger T820 or Snapdragon 888 Plus.

 
Unisoc Tiger T820
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Tiger T82034% Snapdragon 888 Plus64%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Tiger T82081% Snapdragon 888 Plus80%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Tiger T82033% Snapdragon 888 Plus62%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Tiger T820 Snapdragon 888 Plus
Total score480533897046
CPU134552251179
GPU182597340878
MEM76880143532
UX86490161476

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Tiger T820 Snapdragon 888 Plus
Single-Core7021250
Multi-Core28963945

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Tiger T820 Snapdragon 888 Plus
Frequency2700 MHz3000 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography6 nm5 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration1x2.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
3x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
1x3.0 GHz Kryo 680 Prime
3x2.4 GHz Kryo 680 Gold
4x1.8 GHz Kryo 680 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)5 W10 W
Memory typeLPDDR4/4x/4yLPDDR5 (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory16 Gb32 Gb
Memory Frequency21333200
Memory bandwidth4864
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache256 KB512 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8.2-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 888 Plus is 9% better than Tiger T820 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G57 MP6Adreno 660
GPU Frequency850 MHz700 MHz
GFloPS8461486
# of Cores6
# of Shader Units512
Display2160 x 1080 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile28.233.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)42.1106.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra55.162.4
Call of Duty: Mobile52.458.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)34.190.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition54.9131.1
Real Racing 3110.5127.2
Sniper 3D104.5140.4
Need for Speed No Limits77.589.7
Mortal Kombat X88.491.8
CSR Racing 265.777.1
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution108 MP200 MP
Dual Camera resolution20 MP64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Vivi Magic 6.0Qualcomm Spectra 580
Video Encoding FPS6060
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCDolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10


Networks and Navigation
ModemIvy V510 5GQualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G
Download speed3500 MBit/s.7500 MBit/s.
Upload speed2500 MBit/s.3000 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGNSS, NavIC enabled, Dual frequency GNSS, Galileo, NavIC, SBAS, GLONASS, Beidou, GPS, QZSS
NFC supportYesYes
5G supportYesYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T820 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus is better: 33
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Tiger T820 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Snapdragon 888 Plus SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Tiger T820 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T700
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra


Snapdragon 888 Plus SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands