|
MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872, compare of GPUs Mali-G71 MP3 and Mali-T880 MP4. This performance comparison involves two processors: Helio X23 (MT6797D) is deca-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 is gexa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, PCMark, AnTuTu 8, GeekBench 6, 5, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, Octane V2, 3DMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, and how good the CPUs are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Fortnite, Real Racing 3 etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Helio X23 (MT6797D) or Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio X23 (MT6797D) | 6% |
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 | 6% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio X23 (MT6797D) | 42% |
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 | 56% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio X23 (MT6797D) | 3% |
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 | 3% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio X23 (MT6797D) |
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 | Total score | 92331 | 92314 | CPU | 25856 | 25851 | GPU | 35085 | 35084 | MEM | 14776 | 14780 | UX | 16609 | 16607 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio X23 (MT6797D) |
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 | Single-Core | 238 | 238 | Multi-Core | 1075 | 1075 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio X23 (MT6797D) |
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 | Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 10 | 6 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 20 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 (Dual Channel) | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 800 | 1650 | Memory bandwidth | 14 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 384 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X23 (MT6797D) is 13% better than Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Helio X23 (MT6797D) has -4 more core than Exynos 5 Hexa 7872. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G71 MP3 | GPU Frequency | 780 MHz | 1200 MHz | GFloPS | 106 | 124 | # of Cores | 4 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 19.4 | 18.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 33.3 | 32.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 21.6 | 20.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 16.8 | 15.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 20.9 | 19.8 | Real Racing 3 | 41.6 | 56.7 | Sniper 3D | 63.3 | 71.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 53.3 | 58.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 53.3 | 51.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 46.6 | 42.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 21.7 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | LTE Cat.7 2CA | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) is better: 20
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 is better: 15 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Helio X23 (MT6797D) and Exynos 5 Hexa 7872, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Helio X23 (MT6797D) SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
| |
|