Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 benchmark which processor is better

Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872

Comparisons   03-12-2021
   Full compare data of Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu, PassMark, Vellamo, Geekbench, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Call of Duty etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Unisoc Tiger T606 or Exynos 5 Hexa 7872.

 
Unisoc Tiger T606
Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Unisoc Tiger T6069% Exynos 5 Hexa 78726%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Unisoc Tiger T60669% Exynos 5 Hexa 787256%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Unisoc Tiger T6068% Exynos 5 Hexa 78723%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Unisoc Tiger T606 Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
Total score13803092314
CPU3864825851
GPU5244735084
MEM2209214780
UX2485416607

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Unisoc Tiger T606 Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
Single-Core236238
Multi-Core13461075

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Unisoc Tiger T606 Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
Frequency1600 MHz2000 MHz
Cores86
Bit6464
Lithography12 nm14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A73
4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)9 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR4xLPDDR3
Max. Memory8 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency16001650
Memory bandwidth2924
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache1 MB4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.1-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 is 19% better than Unisoc Tiger T606 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Unisoc Tiger T606 has -2 more core than Exynos 5 Hexa 7872. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G71 MP3
GPU Frequency650 MHz1200 MHz
GFloPS332.53124
# of Cores13
# of Shader Units
Display2160 x 1080 pixels1920 x 1200 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)26.418.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra38.532.4
Call of Duty: Mobile35.220.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)26.815.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition38.419.8
Real Racing 357.256.7
Sniper 3D49.471.3
Need for Speed No Limits45.858.3
Mortal Kombat X43.651.8
CSR Racing 241.742.1
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution24 MP21.7 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS30120
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE-7LTE Cat.7 2CA
Download speed300 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportYesNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T606 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 is better: 15
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Unisoc Tiger T606 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark


Unisoc Tiger T606 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Helio P40
• Vs Samsung Exynos 850
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
• Vs MediaTek Helio G25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
• Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603


Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
• Vs MediaTek Helio G25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Samsung Exynos 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio P40
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands