|
Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G71 MP4 and Mali-G71 MP3. This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 is gexa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Kirin 710A is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as 3DMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, Octane V2, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 or Kirin 710A and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreExynos 5 Hexa 7872 | 6% |
Kirin 710A | 9% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 | 56% |
Kirin 710A | 58% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingExynos 5 Hexa 7872 | 3% |
Kirin 710A | 8% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 |
Kirin 710A | Total score | 92314 | 132403 | CPU | 25851 | 37068 | GPU | 35084 | 50304 | MEM | 14780 | 21184 | UX | 16607 | 23842 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 |
Kirin 710A | Single-Core | 238 | 270 | Multi-Core | 1075 | 1191 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 |
Kirin 710A | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 6 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3x | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1650 | 933 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 384 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 710A is 9% better than Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 has 2 more core than Kirin 710A. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G71 MP3 | Mali-G71 MP4 | GPU Frequency | 1200 MHz | 950 MHz | GFloPS | 124 | 169 | # of Cores | 3 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 25.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 18.4 | 49.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 32.4 | 61.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 20.3 | 28.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 15.6 | 43.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 19.8 | 63.6 | Real Racing 3 | 56.7 | 108 | Sniper 3D | 71.3 | 117.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 58.3 | 74 | Mortal Kombat X | 51.8 | 89.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 42.1 | 74 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 21.7 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE Cat.7 2CA | | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710A is better: 26 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 and Kirin 710A, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Kirin 710A SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|