|
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek Helio P35 vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872, compare of GPUs PowerVR GE8320 and Mali-G71 MP3. This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio P35 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 is gexa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as AnTuTu, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, Octane V2, PCMark, Neocore, 3DMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Helio P35 or Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio P35 | 6% |
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 | 6% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio P35 | 62% |
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 | 56% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio P35 | 3% |
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 | 3% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio P35 |
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 | Total score | 85543 | 92314 | CPU | 23959 | 25851 | GPU | 32516 | 35084 | MEM | 13679 | 14780 | UX | 15397 | 16607 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio P35 |
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 | Single-Core | 221 | 238 | Multi-Core | 996 | 1075 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio P35 |
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 6 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 1650 | Memory bandwidth | 14.9 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 384 KB | L2 cache | | 512 KB | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Helio P35 has -2 more core than Exynos 5 Hexa 7872. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G71 MP3 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 1200 MHz | GFloPS | 126.8 | 124 | # of Cores | 2 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 17.7 | 18.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 30.4 | 32.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 18.9 | 20.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 14.4 | 15.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 17.9 | 19.8 | Real Racing 3 | 60.8 | 56.7 | Sniper 3D | 39.5 | 71.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 42.6 | 58.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 39.5 | 51.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 42.6 | 42.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 25 MP | 21.7 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8 |
Networks and NavigationModem | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | LTE Cat.7 2CA | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P35 is better: 12
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 is better: 24 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Helio P35 and Exynos 5 Hexa 7872, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Helio P35 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
| |
|