Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 benchmark which processor is better

Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T880 MP4 and Mali-G71 MP3.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 is gexa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Kirin 950 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.

   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as AnTuTu, 3DMark, Quadrant, PCMark, PassMark, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, Geekbench, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of SoCs in PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 or Kirin 950 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.


 
Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
HiSilicon Kirin 950

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Exynos 5 Hexa 78726% Kirin 9507%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Exynos 5 Hexa 787256% Kirin 95048%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Exynos 5 Hexa 78723% Kirin 9506%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 Kirin 950
Total score92314100285
CPU2585128073
GPU3508438102
MEM1478016044
UX1660718046

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 Kirin 950
Single-Core238265
Multi-Core1075902

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 Kirin 950
Frequency2000 MHz2300 MHz
Cores68
Bit6464
Lithography14 nm16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A73
4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A72
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)7 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR3LPDDR4x
Max. Memory4 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency16501600
Memory bandwidth2425.6
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache384 KB
L2 cache512 KB
L3 cache4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 950 is 13% better than Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 has 2 more core than Kirin 950. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G71 MP3Mali-T880 MP4
GPU Frequency1200 MHz900 MHz
GFloPS124122.31
# of Cores34
# of Shader Units
Display1920 x 1200 pixels2560 x 1600 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)18.422.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra32.438.7
Call of Duty: Mobile20.325.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)15.619.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition19.824.3
Real Racing 356.748.4
Sniper 3D71.361.9
Need for Speed No Limits58.354.2
Mortal Kombat X51.861.9
CSR Racing 242.142.6
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution21.7 MP20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS12030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8H.264


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE Cat.7 2CA
Download speed300 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 is better: 15
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 950 is better: 21
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 and Kirin 950, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
Kirin 950 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark


Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
• Vs MediaTek Helio G25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Samsung Exynos 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio P40
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290


Kirin 950 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Helio G35
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Kirin 710A
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Snapdragon 460
• Vs Exynos 9609
• Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Helio P70
• Vs Snapdragon 670
• Vs Snapdragon 665
• Vs Exynos 9611
• Vs Exynos 9610
• Vs Kirin 970
• Vs Helio P60
• Vs Helio P90
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Helio P95
• Vs Snapdragon 675
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs SC9863A
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands