|
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs MediaTek Helio P90, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T880 MP4 and PowerVR GM 9446. This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 950 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Helio P90 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, GeekBench 6, 5, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, GFXBench, and how good the SoCs are in games Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Fortnite etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chip is better to buy Kirin 950 or Helio P90 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 950 | 48% |
Helio P90 | 64% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 950 |
Helio P90 | Total score | 100285 | 166210 | CPU | 28073 | 46539 | GPU | 38102 | 63167 | MEM | 16044 | 26589 | UX | 18046 | 29921 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 950 |
Helio P90 | Single-Core | 265 | 340 | Multi-Core | 902 | 1430 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 950 |
Helio P90 | Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 3733 | Memory bandwidth | 25.6 | 13.91 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | 1 MB | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 950 is 4% better than Helio P90 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T880 MP4 | PowerVR GM 9446 | GPU Frequency | 900 MHz | 970 MHz | GFloPS | 122.31 | 247.35 | # of Cores | 4 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 20.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 22.3 | 24.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 38.7 | 54.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 25.5 | 27.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 19.1 | 21.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 24.3 | 30.2 | Real Racing 3 | 48.4 | 108.8 | Sniper 3D | 61.9 | 103.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 54.2 | 97.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 61.9 | 87 | CSR Racing 2 | 42.6 | 76.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 20 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 24 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Beidou, Glonass | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 950 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P90 is better: 29 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Kirin 950 and Helio P90, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Kirin 950 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
Helio P90 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|