Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 benchmark which processor is better

Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950, compare of GPUs Mali-T880 MP4 and Adreno 510.

   This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 is gexa-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Kirin 950 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.

   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as PassMark, Quadrant, PCMark, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, 3DMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D etc.

   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 or Kirin 950 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.


 
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
HiSilicon Kirin 950

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Snapdragon 650 MSM89566% Kirin 9507%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Snapdragon 650 MSM895625% Kirin 95048%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Snapdragon 650 MSM89563% Kirin 9506%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 Kirin 950
Total score86746100285
CPU2427928073
GPU3295738102
MEM1387416044
UX1562318046

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 Kirin 950
Single-Core224265
Multi-Core1010902

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 Kirin 950
Frequency1800 MHz2300 MHz
Cores68
Bit6464
Lithography28 nm16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A72
4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A72
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)6 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR4x (Dual Channel)LPDDR4x
Max. Memory8 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency18661600
Memory bandwidth1425.6
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache256 KB
L2 cache1 MB
L3 cache1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 950 is 21% better than Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 has 2 more core than Kirin 950. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUAdreno 510Mali-T880 MP4
GPU Frequency600 MHz900 MHz
GFloPS176122.31
# of Cores4
# of Shader Units128
Display2560 x 1600 pixels2560 x 1600 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)17.822.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra31.138.7
Call of Duty: Mobile19.925.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)15.419.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition18.224.3
Real Racing 354.448.4
Sniper 3D59.161.9
Need for Speed No Limits5654.2
Mortal Kombat X45.161.9
CSR Racing 243.542.6
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution21 MP20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolution4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon X8 LTE modem
Download speed300 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed100 MBit/s.50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 is better: 15
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 950 is better: 20
   You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
Kirin 950 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark


Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
• Vs MediaTek Helio G25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Samsung Exynos 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio P40
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290


Kirin 950 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Helio G35
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Kirin 710A
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Snapdragon 460
• Vs Exynos 9609
• Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Helio P70
• Vs Snapdragon 670
• Vs Snapdragon 665
• Vs Exynos 9611
• Vs Exynos 9610
• Vs Kirin 970
• Vs Helio P60
• Vs Helio P90
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Helio P95
• Vs Snapdragon 675
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs SC9863A
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands