HiSilicon Kirin 710A specs
HiSilicon Kirin 710A is a mid-range chip designed for mobile gadgets such as tablets and smartphones, SoC release year 2018. The SoC created by a 14 nm process. The chipset has a octa-core configuration divided into two clusters. The first ARM Cortex-A73 is the most powerful with four cores working at 2.2 GHz. The second cluster ARM Cortex-A53 has four cores running at 1.7 GHz. The SoC can work with 64-bit data. Mali-G71 MP4 GPU is responsible for operating with graphics. Devices that have the Kirin 710A can work in 4th generation networks. Modem allows you to download and upload data at a speed 300 MBit/s and 150 MBit/s. You can understand Kirin 710A chip is good or bad from comparisons with other processors and benchmark data.
HiSilicon Kirin 710A specifications General Info Brand HiSilicon Name Kirin 710A Model Cortex-A73 Release date 2018 CPU configuration 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73, 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 Instruction set architecture ARMv8-A Frequency 2200 MHz Cores 8 Word Size 64 bit Process 14 nm Transistor count ? Technologies big.LITTLE architecture,security engine inSE 1.0,Yueyin 2.0 Power consumption (TDP) 5 W L1 cache 256 KB L2 cache 512 KB
Graphics GPU Mali-G71 MP4 Frequency 950 MHz Cores 4 Process 16 nm
Memory Type LPDDR3x Frequency 933 MHz Max volume 8 Gb Internal type eMMC 5.1 Memory bus 2x 32 Bit
Connectivity Download speed 300 MBit/s Upload speed 150 MBit/s LTE Cat Cat-13 DL/Cat-12 UL Wi-Fi ranges a/b/g/n/ac Location GPS,Galileo,Glonass,Beidou Wi-Fi ver. 4 Bluetooth ver. 4.2
Cameras Main camera max resolution 16 MPix Second camera max resolution 8 and 8 MPix Codecs 1920 x 1080, max FPS 60. Codec: H.264
Display and Audio Maximum Display resolution 1920 x 1080 pix Video encoding Resolution FullHD, max FPS 30. Codec: H.264 Audio codecs CAF MP4 WAV AIFF MP3
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile • 3DMark • Antutu v10 HiSilicon Kirin 710A SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
HiSilicon Kirin 710A review VIDEO