Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 benchmark which processor is better

HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895, comparison of GPUs Mali-G71 MP20 and Mali-G71 MP4.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 710A is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is octa-core (Exynos Mongoose). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.

   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as GFXBench, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D etc.

   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy Kirin 710A or Exynos 9 Octa 8895 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.


 
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Kirin 710A9% Exynos 9 Octa 889512%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Kirin 710A58% Exynos 9 Octa 889564%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Kirin 710A8% Exynos 9 Octa 88959%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Kirin 710A Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Total score132403176074
CPU3706849309
GPU5030466905
MEM2118428174
UX2384231689

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Kirin 710A Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Single-Core270488
Multi-Core11911515

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Kirin 710A Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Frequency2200 MHz2300 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography14 nm10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73
4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x2.3 GHz Exynos Mongoose
4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)5 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR3xLPDDR4
Max. Memory8 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency9331866
Memory bandwidth29
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache256 KB64 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is 4% better than Kirin 710A in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G71 MP4Mali-G71 MP20
GPU Frequency950 MHz546 MHz
GFloPS169371.2
# of Cores420
# of Shader Units
Display1920 x 1080 pixels4096 x 2160 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile25.623.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)49.927.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra61.758.8
Call of Duty: Mobile28.530.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)43.224.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition63.633.5
Real Racing 310873.5
Sniper 3D117.294.1
Need for Speed No Limits7482.3
Mortal Kombat X89.594.1
CSR Racing 27482.3
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution16 MP28 MP
Dual Camera resolution8 MP28 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS30120
Video Encoding resolutionFullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE Cat.13/16 2/5 CA
Download speed300 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710A is better: 12
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is better: 24
   You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Kirin 710A and Exynos 9 Octa 8895, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Kirin 710A SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
Exynos 9 Octa 8895 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Kirin 710A SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Rockchip RK3562


Exynos 9 Octa 8895 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands