 |
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs MediaTek Helio P95 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs MediaTek Helio P95, speed examination of GPUs PowerVR GM 9446 and Mali-G71 MP4. This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 710A is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Helio P95 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, PassMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, GeekBench 6, 5, Neocore, AnTuTu 8, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy Kirin 710A or Helio P95 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreKirin 710A | 9% |
Helio P95 | 12% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 710A | 58% |
Helio P95 | 66% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingKirin 710A | 8% |
Helio P95 | 11% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 710A |
Helio P95 | Total score | 132403 | 169367 | CPU | 37068 | 47417 | GPU | 50304 | 64358 | MEM | 21184 | 27095 | UX | 23842 | 30482 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 710A |
Helio P95 | Single-Core | 270 | 347 | Multi-Core | 1191 | 1458 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 710A |
Helio P95 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3x | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 933 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | | 13.91 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 512 KB | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G71 MP4 | PowerVR GM 9446 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 970 MHz | GFloPS | 169 | 247.35 | # of Cores | 4 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 25.6 | 22.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 49.9 | 26.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 61.7 | 56.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 28.5 | 29.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 43.2 | 23.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 63.6 | 32.7 | Real Racing 3 | 108 | 99.2 | Sniper 3D | 117.2 | 73.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 74 | 79.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 89.5 | 73.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 74 | 73.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 8 MP | 24 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Beidou, Glonass | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710A is better: 13
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P95 is better: 20 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Kirin 710A SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
Helio P95 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|