|
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Samsung Exynos 9810 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Samsung Exynos 9810, compare of GPUs Mali-G72 MP18 and Mali-G71 MP4. This performance comparison includes two processors: Kirin 710A is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Exynos 9810 is octa-core (Exynos M3 Mongoose). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, Neocore, Quadrant, PCMark, 3DMark, Geekbench, Octane V2, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, GFXBench, and how good the processors are in games PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy Kirin 710A or Exynos 9810 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreKirin 710A | 9% |
Exynos 9810 | 15% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 710A | 58% |
Exynos 9810 | 63% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingKirin 710A | 8% |
Exynos 9810 | 13% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 710A |
Exynos 9810 | Total score | 132403 | 214536 | CPU | 37068 | 60078 | GPU | 50304 | 81523 | MEM | 21184 | 34334 | UX | 23842 | 38617 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 710A |
Exynos 9810 | Single-Core | 270 | 442 | Multi-Core | 1191 | 1770 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 710A |
Exynos 9810 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2900 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.9 GHz Exynos M3 Mongoose 4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3x | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 6 Gb | Memory Frequency | 933 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | | 26.82 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 512 KB | | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9810 is 24% better than Kirin 710A in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G71 MP4 | Mali-G72 MP18 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 169 | 519.97 | # of Cores | 4 | 18 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 25.6 | 19.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 49.9 | 39.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 61.7 | 45.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 28.5 | 35.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 43.2 | 34.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 63.6 | 49.9 | Real Racing 3 | 108 | 79.8 | Sniper 3D | 117.2 | 73 | Need for Speed No Limits | 74 | 63.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 89.5 | 73 | CSR Racing 2 | 74 | 50.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 28 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 8 MP | 28 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | LTE Cat.13/18 2/5 CA | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 900 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710A is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9810 is better: 24 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Kirin 710A and Exynos 9810, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Kirin 710A SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
Exynos 9810 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
| |
|