|
MediaTek MT6762VCB vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 |
|
Comparisons 07-10-2023 Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek MT6762VCB vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, PassMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, PCMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Neocore, and how good the chips are in games Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy MediaTek MT6762VCB or Snapdragon 636.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek MT6762VCB | 5% |
Snapdragon 636 | 7% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek MT6762VCB | 68% |
Snapdragon 636 | 57% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek MT6762VCB | 3% |
Snapdragon 636 | 6% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek MT6762VCB |
Snapdragon 636 | Total score | 77776 | 98787 | CPU | 21776 | 27664 | GPU | 29561 | 37543 | MEM | 12450 | 15797 | UX | 13989 | 17777 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek MT6762VCB |
Snapdragon 636 | Single-Core | 201 | 255 | Multi-Core | 905 | 1150 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek MT6762VCB |
Snapdragon 636 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | 8x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | 1333 | Memory bandwidth | | | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek MT6762VCB is 9% better than Snapdragon 636 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 509 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 126.8 | 178 | # of Cores | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | 128 | Display | 1600 x 720 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 14.7 | 21.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 26.4 | 37.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 14.6 | 24.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 11.8 | 18.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 14.3 | 23.2 | Real Racing 3 | 46.8 | 74.2 | Sniper 3D | 34.1 | 48.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 32.6 | 44.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 34.6 | 59.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 29.8 | 40.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 21 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 160 | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 450 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6762VCB is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 is better: 27 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek MT6762VCB SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
Snapdragon 636 SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|