|
MediaTek MT6762VCB vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 |
|
Comparisons 07-10-2023 Full compare data of MediaTek MT6762VCB vs MediaTek Kompanio 500, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Vellamo, Geekbench, 3DMark, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, AnTuTu, PCMark, PassMark, and how good the processors are in games Madout2, GTA, Fortnite, Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek MT6762VCB or MediaTek Kompanio 500.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek MT6762VCB | 5% |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | 14% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek MT6762VCB | 68% |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | 68% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek MT6762VCB | 3% |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | 13% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek MT6762VCB |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | Total score | 77776 | 195457 | CPU | 21776 | 54729 | GPU | 29561 | 74271 | MEM | 12450 | 31280 | UX | 13989 | 35190 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek MT6762VCB |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | Single-Core | 201 | 298 | Multi-Core | 905 | 1180 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek MT6762VCB |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | | 18 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 126.8 | 184 | # of Cores | 2 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 14.7 | 29.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 26.4 | 54.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 14.6 | 30.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 11.8 | 23.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 14.3 | 39.6 | Real Racing 3 | 46.8 | 108.5 | Sniper 3D | 34.1 | 86.9 | Need for Speed No Limits | 32.6 | 86.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 34.6 | 86.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 29.8 | 75.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 21 MP | 32 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5 | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6762VCB is better: 4
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 500 is better: 27 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MediaTek MT6762VCB SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
MediaTek Kompanio 500 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
| |
|