|
MediaTek MT6762VCB vs Allwinner A523 |
|
Comparisons 07-10-2023 Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek MT6762VCB vs Allwinner A523, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Antutu v10, 9, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, PassMark, PCMark, and how good the SoCs are in games GTA, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy MediaTek MT6762VCB or A523.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek MT6762VCB | 5% |
A523 | 12% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek MT6762VCB | 68% |
A523 | 53% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek MT6762VCB | 3% |
A523 | 9% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek MT6762VCB |
A523 | Total score | 77776 | 167563 | CPU | 21776 | 46909 | GPU | 29561 | 63678 | MEM | 12450 | 26807 | UX | 13989 | 30170 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek MT6762VCB |
A523 | Single-Core | 201 | 796 | Multi-Core | 905 | 3186 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek MT6762VCB |
A523 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 22 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | 8x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3, LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | DDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | 2x LPDDR4 up to 2400MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz | Memory bandwidth | | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 1 MB | L2 cache | | 2 MB | L3 cache | | 16 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek MT6762VCB is 9% better than A523 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC1 2EE | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 126.8 | 540 | # of Cores | 2 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 21.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 14.7 | 26.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 26.4 | 56.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 14.6 | 29.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 11.8 | 23.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 14.3 | 32.7 | Real Racing 3 | 46.8 | 98.9 | Sniper 3D | 34.1 | 73.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | 32.6 | 79.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 34.6 | 73.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 29.8 | 79.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 21 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 450 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6762VCB is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A523 is better: 31 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek MT6762VCB SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
A523 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
| |
|