MediaTek MT6580P vs MediaTek MT8312

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6580P vs MediaTek MT8312, compare of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-400.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6580P is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT8312 is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as AnTuTu 8, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy MT6580P or MT8312 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6580P

MT8312

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6580P

28%

MT8312

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6580P

MT8312

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6580P	MT8312
Total score	20298	12334
CPU	5679	3453
GPU	7718	4682
MEM	3247	1969
UX	3656	2228

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6580P	MT8312
Single-Core	53	32
Multi-Core	248	150

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6580P	MT8312
Frequency	1300 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	4	2
Bit	32	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	2x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	1 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	266	433
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that MT6580P has -2 more core than MT8312. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-400 MP2	Mali-400
GPU Frequency	400 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	8.4	3.6
# of Cores	2	1
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	4.6	2.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	15.1	9.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	9.1	5.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	7.7	4.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	11.3	6.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	19.3	11.5
Real Racing 3	13.7	7.3
Sniper 3D	14.6	11
Need for Speed No Limits	10.9	9.3
Mortal Kombat X	10.5	8.4
CSR Racing 2	11.8	7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	5 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	HD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6580P is better: 23
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8312 is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets MT6580P and MT8312, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6580P SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6580P specs and review.

MT8312 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8312 specs and review.