MediaTek MT8312 vs Spreadtrum SC9832

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT8312 vs Spreadtrum SC9832, comparison of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-400.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT8312 is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Spreadtrum SC9832 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as Geekbench, Quadrant, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, Neocore, Vellamo, Octane V2, AnTuTu, PassMark, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, and how good the processors are in games Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy MT8312 or Spreadtrum SC9832 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8312

Spreadtrum SC9832

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8312

24%

Spreadtrum SC9832

30%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8312

Spreadtrum SC9832

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8312	Spreadtrum SC9832
Total score	12334	22092
CPU	3453	6178
GPU	4682	8392
MEM	1969	3534
UX	2228	3986

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8312	Spreadtrum SC9832
Single-Core	32	58
Multi-Core	150	270

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8312	Spreadtrum SC9832
Frequency	1300 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	2	4
Bit	32	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	2 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency	433	266
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that MT8312 has 2 more core than Spreadtrum SC9832. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-400	Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency	400 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	3.6	8.4
# of Cores	1	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1280 x 800 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	2.1	3.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	9.7	15.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	5.8	9.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	4.2	8.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	6.9	12.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	11.5	20.1
Real Racing 3	7.3	19
Sniper 3D	11	15.2
Need for Speed No Limits	9.3	13.3
Mortal Kombat X	8.4	15.2
CSR Racing 2	7	11.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8312 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9832 is better: 25
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT8312 and Spreadtrum SC9832, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT8312 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8312 specs and review.

Spreadtrum SC9832 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Spreadtrum SC9832 specs and review.